Skip to main content

Graham and Parks vs Haggerty

Graham and Parks and Haggerty are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.1 out of 10. Graham and Parks is significantly larger with 396 students, about 1.7× the size of Haggerty (229). In math proficiency, Haggerty leads at 47.0%.

Attendance data is under correction. A public school's existing Resources & Environment score and overall rating shown here may still reflect an unverified attendance input.

Keep or send this comparison

One email with the link. We add you to School Scout updates; unsubscribe anytime.

Send to my realtor

Open an email to my realtor

Ratings Comparison

MetricGraham and ParksHaggerty
Overall Rating9.1 / 108.7 / 10
Academic Score7.97.4
Growth Score9.59.0
Diversity Index——
Free/Reduced Lunch——
Environment Score9.99.7
State Rank#72 of 1,793#153 of 1,793
State Percentile96th92th

Test Scores

SubjectGraham and ParksHaggerty
Math Proficiency47.0%47.0%
Math (State Avg)——
ELA Proficiency57.0%57.0%
ELA (State Avg)——

School Details

DetailGraham and ParksHaggerty
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
GradesPre-K – 5thPre-K – 5th
Enrollment396229
Student-Teacher Ratio11.3:17.9:1
Free/Reduced Lunch——
DistrictCambridgeCambridge
CityCambridgeCambridge

Neighborhood

MetricCambridge (02138)Cambridge (02138)
Median Household Income$122,040$122,040
Median Home Value$1,088,700$1,088,700
Median Rent$2,799$2,799
College Educated (Bachelor's+)85.6%85.6%
Poverty Rate12.6%12.6%
Avg Commute24 min24 min

The data story: Graham and Parks vs Haggerty

Graham and Parks and Haggerty are separated by just 0.1 points in overall rating — 9.4 versus 9.3 out of 10 — yet both rank in the top ten and top twenty statewide, respectively. Graham and Parks holds the #10 position out of 1,791 Massachusetts schools, while Haggerty sits at #16 out of 1,791, placing both schools in the top 1% in the state. For a parent in Cambridge choosing between them, the difference is less about quality and more about fit.

On academic performance, Graham and Parks scores 8.6 out of 10 against Haggerty's 8.3, a 0.3-point margin. Growth scores are nearly identical: Graham and Parks earns 9.8 out of 10, Haggerty 9.7 — meaning both schools are accelerating student learning at an exceptional and nearly indistinguishable pace. Neither school shows a meaningful gap in how much students progress year over year.

The clearest structural difference between the two schools is size and staffing density. Graham and Parks enrolls 396 students compared to Haggerty's 229 — nearly 73% more children on campus. That scale difference is reflected in the student-teacher ratios: Graham and Parks runs at 11.3 students per teacher, while Haggerty operates at just 7.9 students per teacher. A family that prioritizes more individualized attention and a tighter classroom environment will find that at Haggerty; a family comfortable with a larger, more socially dynamic elementary setting will find that at Graham and Parks.

Both schools serve the same grade band, prekindergarten through fifth grade, and sit 1.5 miles apart within Cambridge. There are no program-level distinctions available in the data to separate them further on curriculum or specialized offerings. The decision essentially comes down to campus scale and the staffing ratio that flows from it — Haggerty's 7.9:1 ratio represents meaningfully more adult contact per child than Graham and Parks's 11.3:1, even as both schools produce top-tier academic and growth outcomes.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Graham and Parks

Graham and Parks suits families who want a proven top-10 Massachusetts elementary with a larger peer community — 396 students across PK–05 — and are comfortable with an 11.3:1 student-teacher ratio. It's the better pick if your child thrives in a busier social environment and you want the marginally stronger academic score of 8.6.

Haggerty

Haggerty is the stronger fit for families where smaller class size and more teacher contact time matter most. At 7.9 students per teacher across a 229-student campus, it offers a tighter, more attentive setting while still ranking #16 in Massachusetts — top 1% statewide — with a 9.7 growth score that matches Graham and Parks almost exactly.

More Comparisons