Skip to main content

PS 180 HUGO NEWMAN vs CENTRAL PARK EAST II

CENTRAL PARK EAST II has a higher overall rating of 9.3/10 compared to 8.6/10. In math proficiency, CENTRAL PARK EAST II leads at 35.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric PS 180 HUGO NEWMAN CENTRAL PARK EAST II
Overall Rating 8.6 / 10 9.3 / 10
Academic Score 6.6 8.6
Growth Score 9.8 10.0
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 80.9% 73%
Environment Score 8.6 8.6
State Rank #181 of 4,739 #12 of 4,739
State Percentile 96th 100th

Test Scores

Subject PS 180 HUGO NEWMAN CENTRAL PARK EAST II
Math Proficiency 26.0% 35.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 32.0% 43.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail PS 180 HUGO NEWMAN CENTRAL PARK EAST II
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Pre-K – 8th Pre-K – 8th
Enrollment 346 422
Student-Teacher Ratio 9.9:1 7.2:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 80.9% 73.0%
Chronic Absenteeism
District NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT # 3 NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT # 4
City New York New York

Neighborhood

Metric New York (10027) New York (10029)
Median Household Income $64,220 $38,308
Median Home Value $915,000 $818,100
Median Rent $1,609 $1,183
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 51.8% 35.7%
Poverty Rate 23.7% 30.6%
Avg Commute 32 min 33 min

The data story: PS 180 HUGO NEWMAN vs CENTRAL PARK EAST II

Central Park East II ranks #168 of 4,742 New York schools, placing it in the top 4% statewide. PS 180 Hugo Newman sits at #1,165 — still inside the top quarter of the state, but nearly 1,000 positions behind. The overall rating gap is 1.2 points, with Central Park East II scoring 8.7/10 against PS 180 Hugo Newman's 7.5/10. For families who weight absolute standing in the state's competitive elementary landscape, that gap is meaningful even though both schools sit within 1.7 miles of each other in New York City.

The academic score delta drives most of that gap: Central Park East II posts an 8.6/10 versus PS 180 Hugo Newman's 6.6/10, a 2-point difference on proficiency-based measures. Growth, however, tells a tighter story. PS 180 Hugo Newman earns a 9.8/10 growth score against Central Park East II's 10.0/10 — a near-tie that indicates both schools are accelerating students at an exceptional rate relative to peers. Families should read this as: Central Park East II starts and ends higher on proficiency, while PS 180 Hugo Newman is pushing its students' trajectories at nearly the same exceptional pace.

On demographics and environment, Central Park East II enrolls 422 students compared to PS 180 Hugo Newman's 346, yet offers a noticeably lower student-teacher ratio — 7.2:1 versus 9.9:1. That means roughly 2.7 fewer students per teacher at Central Park East II, a structural advantage in classroom attention. Free and reduced-price lunch eligibility stands at 81% at PS 180 Hugo Newman and 73% at Central Park East II, an 8-point difference that reflects modestly higher economic need at PS 180 Hugo Newman — relevant context when evaluating support services and peer socioeconomic mix.

Both schools serve prekindergarten through grade 8, so families with younger siblings or those prioritizing a single-school journey from PK through middle school can find that continuity at either campus. The grade-span parity means the choice hinges on other factors rather than a structural mismatch in years served. Central Park East II's state rank advantage and academic score edge come alongside the better staff-to-student ratio, while PS 180 Hugo Newman counters with a nearly identical growth score and a smaller, more intimate enrollment footprint.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

PS 180 HUGO NEWMAN

PS 180 Hugo Newman suits families who value extraordinary student growth — its 9.8/10 growth score means teachers are moving the needle aggressively — and who prefer a smaller school community of 346 students. It's also a practical fit for families already in its catchment who want PK–8 continuity without the competitive draw of a higher-rated alternative.

CENTRAL PARK EAST II

Central Park East II is the stronger fit for families prioritizing top-decile state standing (#168 of 4,742), higher academic proficiency (8.6 vs. 6.6), and the lowest classroom density of the two schools at 7.2 students per teacher. Parents who want both strong growth and a high absolute achievement floor will find that combination here.

More Comparisons