Skip to main content

Lewis Elementary School vs Markham Elementary School

Lewis Elementary School and Markham Elementary School are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.1 out of 10. In math proficiency, Markham Elementary School leads at 47.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Lewis Elementary School Markham Elementary School
Overall Rating 9.1 / 10 9.3 / 10
Academic Score 9.4 9.4
Growth Score 9.6 9.4
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 29.3% 64.4%
Environment Score 7.6 8.9
State Rank #35 of 1,226 #23 of 1,226
State Percentile 97th 98th

Test Scores

Subject Lewis Elementary School Markham Elementary School
Math Proficiency 47.0% 47.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 62.0% 60.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Lewis Elementary School Markham Elementary School
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 297 402
Student-Teacher Ratio 18.6:1 16.1:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 29.3% 64.4%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Portland SD 1J Portland SD 1J
City Portland Portland

Neighborhood

Metric Portland (97206) Portland (97219)
Median Household Income $94,233 $115,525
Median Home Value $480,500 $651,600
Median Rent $1,693 $1,603
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 49.3% 66.1%
Poverty Rate 9.8% 6.7%
Avg Commute 27 min 23 min

The data story: Lewis Elementary School vs Markham Elementary School

Markham Elementary School ranks #23 of 1,226 Oregon schools, placing it 12 spots ahead of Lewis Elementary School at #35. Both schools sit in the top 3% of the state, but Markham's overall rating of 9.3/10 edges past Lewis's 9.1/10 — a gap that looks narrow until you consider how compressed rankings are at that tier. These are two of the strongest elementary schools in Portland, and the meaningful differences lie beneath the headline numbers.

On academics, Lewis Elementary School and Markham Elementary School are dead even at 9.4/10. Where Lewis pulls ahead is on growth: Lewis posts a 9.6/10 growth score versus Markham's 9.4/10, suggesting Lewis is generating measurably stronger year-over-year academic gains relative to student starting points. That two-point growth edge is worth noting for families whose children enter below grade level or who prioritize progress trajectory over absolute performance.

The demographic profiles diverge significantly. Markham Elementary School enrolls 402 students compared to Lewis Elementary School's 297, and Markham serves a substantially higher share of economically disadvantaged families — 64% free/reduced lunch versus 29% at Lewis. Markham's student-teacher ratio is also tighter at 16.1:1 compared to Lewis's 18.6:1, meaning each teacher at Markham covers roughly 2.5 fewer students. That staffing advantage may help explain how Markham achieves equivalent academic scores while serving a higher-need population.

Both schools cover the same grade span, kindergarten through fifth grade, and sit 5.5 miles apart within Portland. The choice ultimately turns on what a family weighs most: Lewis's higher growth score signals exceptional instructional momentum in a smaller, less economically diverse setting, while Markham's stronger state rank, tighter student-teacher ratio, and success with a broader range of socioeconomic backgrounds reflect a school that performs at an elite level under more demanding conditions.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Lewis Elementary School

Lewis Elementary School suits families whose children need strong year-over-year academic growth — particularly those entering with gaps or who want a smaller school environment. With 297 students, a 9.6/10 growth score, and a less economically stressed peer group, Lewis offers a high-performing setting where individual progress is a clear institutional priority.

Markham Elementary School

Markham Elementary School fits families who want the highest state rank available and a school that delivers elite academics across a socioeconomically diverse student body. At #23 in Oregon with a 16.1:1 student-teacher ratio and 402 students, Markham demonstrates that its results aren't products of a sheltered demographic — they're built on stronger staffing and proven instructional systems.

More Comparisons