TOM C GOOCH EL vs C A TATUM JR EL
TOM C GOOCH EL and C A TATUM JR EL are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.2 out of 10. In math proficiency, TOM C GOOCH EL leads at 47.0%.
TOM C GOOCH EL
Dallas, TX
355 students
C A TATUM JR EL
Dallas, TX
417 students
Ratings Comparison
| Metric | TOM C GOOCH EL | C A TATUM JR EL |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 9.2 / 10 | 9.3 / 10 |
| Academic Score | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Growth Score | 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Diversity Index | — | — |
| Free/Reduced Lunch | 89.6% | 98.1% |
| Environment Score | 9.2 | 9.0 |
| State Rank | #72 of 8,547 | #48 of 8,547 |
| State Percentile | 99th | 100th |
Test Scores
| Subject | TOM C GOOCH EL | C A TATUM JR EL |
|---|---|---|
| Math Proficiency | 47.0% | 42.0% |
| Math (State Avg) | — | — |
| ELA Proficiency | 47.0% | 42.0% |
| ELA (State Avg) | — | — |
School Details
Neighborhood
| Metric | Dallas (75244) | Dallas (75227) |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $112,800 | $59,395 |
| Median Home Value | $578,200 | $203,000 |
| Median Rent | $1,918 | $1,277 |
| College Educated (Bachelor's+) | 66.8% | 13.7% |
| Poverty Rate | 8.0% | 16.4% |
| Avg Commute | 22 min | 30 min |
The data story: TOM C GOOCH EL vs C A TATUM JR EL
Tom C Gooch El and C A Tatum Jr El are both top-tier elementary schools in Dallas, Texas, yet C A Tatum Jr El holds a meaningful edge in state rankings — sitting at #48 of 8,547 Texas schools versus Tom C Gooch El's #48 of 8,547 — wait, corrected: C A Tatum Jr El ranks #48 of 8,547 in Texas while Tom C Gooch El ranks #72 of 8,547. Both land in the top 1% statewide, making the choice between them a matter of fine distinctions rather than a clear quality gap. The overall rating difference is just 0.1 points — C A Tatum Jr El at 9.3/10 versus Tom C Gooch El at 9.2/10 — but the state rank gap of 24 positions signals that C A Tatum Jr El is performing at a slightly higher tier when measured against every elementary school in the state.
On academics, both schools are exactly matched with a 9.0/10 academic score, so neither school has an edge in raw proficiency. The separation emerges in growth: C A Tatum Jr El posts a 9.7/10 growth score versus Tom C Gooch El's 9.4/10, a 0.3-point delta that reflects how much additional learning progress students make year over year beyond what their starting point would predict. For families who prioritize whether a school actively accelerates student trajectories — not just where students land — C A Tatum Jr El's growth advantage is the more meaningful number here.
C A Tatum Jr El enrolls 417 students compared to Tom C Gooch El's 355, making it the larger campus by 62 students. Tom C Gooch El offers a slightly smaller student-teacher ratio of 11.8:1 versus 12.3:1 at C A Tatum Jr El, translating to roughly one additional student per classroom at the larger school. The free and reduced-price lunch rate distinguishes these campuses more sharply: C A Tatum Jr El serves a 98% FRL population against Tom C Gooch El's 90%, indicating C A Tatum Jr El operates in a higher-poverty catchment while still outperforming on growth — a testament to its instructional effectiveness with high-need students.
Both schools serve grades PK through 05 and sit 15.3 miles apart within Dallas, so geography will be a practical factor for most families. Neither school separates on grade range or program structure based on available data, meaning the decision rests on the quantitative differences above: C A Tatum Jr El's stronger growth score and higher state rank versus Tom C Gooch El's marginally lower student-teacher ratio and slightly less economically concentrated enrollment.
Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet
Who each school fits
TOM C GOOCH EL
Tom C Gooch El suits families who want a top-1%-in-Texas elementary with a slightly smaller classroom feel — its 11.8:1 student-teacher ratio is the lowest of the two — and whose child is entering a school community that is marginally less economically concentrated than C A Tatum Jr El's 98% FRL population.
C A TATUM JR EL
C A Tatum Jr El is the stronger fit for families who prioritize year-over-year student growth — its 9.7/10 growth score leads Tom C Gooch El by 0.3 points — and who want a school with a higher state rank (#48 vs. #72 of 8,547) that demonstrably accelerates outcomes for students arriving from high-poverty households.