Skip to main content

Castelar Street Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.6/10 compared to 8.8/10. In math proficiency, Charles H. Kim Elementary leads at 49.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Castelar Street Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating 8.8 / 10 9.6 / 10
Academic Score 8.7 9.5
Growth Score 9.0 9.8
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 85.1% 88.3%
Environment Score 8.7 9.3
State Rank #354 of 9,533 #9 of 9,533
State Percentile 96th 100th

Test Scores

Subject Castelar Street Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency 48.0% 49.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 54.0% 60.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Castelar Street Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 8th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 611 472
Student-Teacher Ratio 20.4:1 18.2:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 85.1% 88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Los Angeles Unified Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90012) Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income $67,635 $62,655
Median Home Value $686,400 $1,457,200
Median Rent $2,116 $1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 39.5% 40.0%
Poverty Rate 22.7% 18.8%
Avg Commute 29 min 32 min

The data story: Castelar Street Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Castelar Street Elementary and Charles H. Kim Elementary are both Los Angeles elementary schools serving kindergarten through early grades, but their MySchoolScout ratings diverge sharply. Charles H. Kim Elementary scores 9.6/10 against Castelar Street Elementary's 8.8/10 — a 0.8-point gap that reflects a dramatic difference in state standing. Charles H. Kim Elementary ranks #9 of 9,533 California schools, placing it in the top fraction of a percent statewide, while Castelar Street Elementary ranks #354 of 9,533 — itself an elite result, but trailing Kim by 345 positions.

Academically, Charles H. Kim Elementary holds a 9.5/10 versus Castelar Street Elementary's 8.7/10, a gap of 0.8 points. On growth — how much students advance relative to peers with similar starting points — Kim again leads with 9.8/10 to Castelar's 9.0/10. Both scores are strong in isolation, but Kim's near-perfect growth figure signals that students there are consistently outpacing comparable peers across the state, not merely arriving prepared.

The two schools serve economically similar populations: Castelar Street Elementary reports 85% of students on free or reduced-price lunch, Charles H. Kim Elementary 88% — meaning Kim's academic and growth advantages are not explained by family income differences. Enrollment at Castelar Street Elementary is 611 students versus 472 at Charles H. Kim Elementary, and the student-teacher ratio follows that pattern: 20.4:1 at Castelar Street Elementary compared to 18.2:1 at Charles H. Kim Elementary, giving Kim students meaningfully more daily teacher access.

One structural difference shapes the decision for families with older children: Castelar Street Elementary serves grades KG–08, running through middle school and removing one school transition from a child's elementary years. Charles H. Kim Elementary serves only KG–05, so families there will navigate a middle school search after fifth grade. The 3.9 miles between campuses keeps both within the same general section of Los Angeles, making geography a secondary factor for most families weighing these two schools.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Castelar Street Elementary

Castelar Street Elementary suits families who want to minimize school transitions — its KG–08 span means a child stays on one campus through eighth grade. It also works well for parents who value a larger school community and whose address makes Charles H. Kim Elementary's attendance zone inaccessible. At #354 in California, it delivers genuinely strong outcomes.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary suits families who prioritize maximum academic performance and growth above all else — its #9 statewide rank and 9.8/10 growth score are elite by any measure. The lower student-teacher ratio of 18.2:1 makes it the stronger fit for students who benefit from closer teacher attention, provided families are prepared to find a middle school after fifth grade.

More Comparisons