Skip to main content

City Terrace Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary has a higher overall rating of 9.6/10 compared to 8.8/10. In math proficiency, City Terrace Elementary leads at 52.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric City Terrace Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Overall Rating 8.8 / 10 9.6 / 10
Academic Score 9.0 9.5
Growth Score 8.4 9.8
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 75% 88.3%
Environment Score 9.3 9.3
State Rank #356 of 9,533 #9 of 9,533
State Percentile 96th 100th

Test Scores

Subject City Terrace Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Math Proficiency 52.0% 49.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 55.0% 60.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail City Terrace Elementary Charles H. Kim Elementary
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 332 472
Student-Teacher Ratio 18.4:1 18.2:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 75.0% 88.3%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Los Angeles Unified Los Angeles Unified
City Los Angeles Los Angeles

Neighborhood

Metric Los Angeles (90063) Los Angeles (90004)
Median Household Income $71,725 $62,655
Median Home Value $619,100 $1,457,200
Median Rent $1,489 $1,752
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 12.8% 40.0%
Poverty Rate 16.7% 18.8%
Avg Commute 31 min 32 min

The data story: City Terrace Elementary vs Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary ranks #9 of 9,533 California schools, placing it in the top 0.1% statewide. City Terrace Elementary, ranked #356 of 9,533, still lands in the top 4% — a genuinely strong result — but the gap between the two schools is substantial. Charles H. Kim Elementary scores 9.6/10 overall against City Terrace Elementary's 8.8/10, an 0.8-point difference that reflects a meaningful performance divide between two schools serving the same grade band, KG–05, just 7.9 miles apart in Los Angeles.

On academics, City Terrace Elementary earns a 9.0/10 while Charles H. Kim Elementary earns a 9.5/10 — a half-point gap that narrows the distance somewhat. Where the schools diverge most sharply is growth: Charles H. Kim Elementary scores 9.8/10 on growth versus City Terrace Elementary's 8.4/10, a 1.4-point delta. Growth scores measure how much students advance relative to academic peers year over year, so that spread suggests Charles H. Kim Elementary is accelerating students considerably faster regardless of where they start.

Charles H. Kim Elementary enrolls 472 students compared to City Terrace Elementary's 332, making it the larger campus. Both schools run nearly identical student-teacher ratios — 18.2:1 at Charles H. Kim Elementary versus 18.4:1 at City Terrace Elementary — so class-size experience is effectively the same. On free and reduced-price lunch eligibility, Charles H. Kim Elementary serves a higher-need population at 88% versus City Terrace Elementary's 75%. The fact that Charles H. Kim Elementary posts superior academic and growth numbers while serving a more economically disadvantaged student body makes its performance particularly notable.

Both schools cover the same grade span, KG through 5th, so families are making a like-for-like comparison at the program level. Neither school has differentiated magnet or gifted tracks reflected in the available data. The distinction comes down entirely to measured outcomes: Charles H. Kim Elementary's growth advantage of 1.4 points and its top-10 state ranking set it apart from City Terrace Elementary in ways that are concrete and consistent across multiple scoring dimensions.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

City Terrace Elementary

City Terrace Elementary suits families already rooted in its immediate neighborhood who want a high-performing school — top 4% statewide — without relocating across the city. Its smaller enrollment of 332 students may appeal to parents who prefer a tighter-knit campus feel, and its 9.0 academic score signals strong instructional outcomes for local families.

Charles H. Kim Elementary

Charles H. Kim Elementary is the better fit for families who can manage the 7.9-mile distance and prioritize maximizing student growth. Its 9.8/10 growth score and #9 state ranking make it one of the highest-performing elementary schools in California, and it achieves that while serving a high-need population — a track record that gives its outcomes more credibility, not less.

More Comparisons