One Hundred Twelfth Street Elementary vs Compton Avenue Elementary

Compton Avenue Elementary edges out One Hundred Twelfth Street Elementary by 0.7 rating points — 9.3 versus 8.6 out of 10. That gap translates into a meaningful difference in state standing: Compton Avenue Elementary ranks #103 out of 9,533 schools in California, placing it in the top 2% statewide, while One Hundred Twelfth Street Elementary ranks #693, still a strong top-8% finish. Both schools sit 0.7 miles apart in Los Angeles and serve the same grade span, KG through 5th.

The sharpest distinction between the two schools is academic proficiency. Compton Avenue Elementary scores 8.3 out of 10 on academics versus 7.0 for One Hundred Twelfth Street Elementary — a 1.3-point difference that reflects a concrete gap in tested subject-matter mastery. Growth, however, is a dead heat: both Compton Avenue Elementary and One Hundred Twelfth Street Elementary score a near-perfect 9.9 out of 10, meaning students at either school are making exceptional year-over-year learning gains relative to similar peers. A family weighing current proficiency against trajectory will find strong momentum at both campuses but a higher achievement floor at Compton Avenue.

Compton Avenue Elementary enrolls 270 students against One Hundred Twelfth Street Elementary's 336, and its student-teacher ratio of 18.0:1 is modestly tighter than One Hundred Twelfth Street Elementary's 19.8:1 — roughly two fewer students per classroom on average. On the economic equity measure, One Hundred Twelfth Street Elementary serves 100% free- and reduced-lunch-eligible students, while Compton Avenue Elementary serves 95%. Both schools draw from high-need communities, so neither number signals a meaningful resource advantage; it's the kind of delta that reflects neighborhood demographics more than school quality.

Both schools operate on identical grade configurations — kindergarten through fifth grade — leaving no structural reason for a family to choose one over the other based on program span. The decision ultimately rests on whether current academic proficiency levels or other family-specific factors tip the scale, since growth trajectories are indistinguishable.