Skip to main content

PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH vs CENTRAL PARK EAST II

CENTRAL PARK EAST II has a higher overall rating of 9.3/10 compared to 8.8/10. In math proficiency, PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH leads at 66.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH CENTRAL PARK EAST II
Overall Rating 8.8 / 10 9.3 / 10
Academic Score 9.3 8.6
Growth Score 9.7 10.0
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 66.4% 73%
Environment Score 5.9 8.6
State Rank #116 of 4,739 #12 of 4,739
State Percentile 98th 100th

Test Scores

Subject PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH CENTRAL PARK EAST II
Math Proficiency 66.0% 35.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 63.0% 43.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH CENTRAL PARK EAST II
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Pre-K – 5th Pre-K – 8th
Enrollment 524 422
Student-Teacher Ratio 13.1:1 7.2:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 66.4% 73.0%
Chronic Absenteeism
District NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT # 3 NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT # 4
City New York New York

Neighborhood

Metric New York (10025) New York (10029)
Median Household Income $109,195 $38,308
Median Home Value $1,125,200 $818,100
Median Rent $2,009 $1,183
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 68.8% 35.7%
Poverty Rate 15.1% 30.6%
Avg Commute 32 min 33 min

The data story: PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH vs CENTRAL PARK EAST II

PS 163 Alfred E Smith and Central Park East II sit just 1.6 miles apart in New York City and land nearly identically in the state rankings — PS 163 Alfred E Smith at #166 of 4,742 New York schools and Central Park East II at #168 of 4,742 — with both schools earning an overall rating of 8.7/10. That two-position gap is functionally a tie at the top of the statewide distribution, meaning neither school holds a meaningful edge on overall performance alone.

The academic and growth scores tell a more nuanced story. PS 163 Alfred E Smith carries a 9.3/10 academic score against Central Park East II's 8.6/10 — a 0.7-point gap that reflects stronger measured proficiency on state assessments. Central Park East II flips the script on growth, earning a perfect 10.0/10 growth score compared to PS 163 Alfred E Smith's already-strong 9.7/10. That 0.3-point growth edge means students at Central Park East II are outpacing academic expectations at a slightly higher rate, even if their baseline proficiency scores sit lower.

On demographics and classroom structure, the two schools diverge noticeably. Central Park East II's student-teacher ratio of 7.2:1 is nearly half that of PS 163 Alfred E Smith's 13.1:1, meaning students at Central Park East II receive significantly more individualized adult attention per day. Central Park East II also serves a higher share of economically disadvantaged students — 73% free/reduced lunch versus 66% at PS 163 Alfred E Smith — and does so with stronger growth outcomes, which speaks to the effectiveness of its model with that population. PS 163 Alfred E Smith enrolls 524 students compared to Central Park East II's 422, making it the larger school by about 100 students.

The most structural difference between these two schools is grade span. PS 163 Alfred E Smith serves grades PK–05, functioning as a pure elementary school. Central Park East II runs PK–08, carrying students through middle school and eliminating a transition year entirely. For families with younger children, that continuity through eighth grade means one fewer school search and application cycle during the critical middle-grades years.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH

PS 163 Alfred E Smith suits families who prioritize high measured academic proficiency — its 9.3/10 academic score is 0.7 points above Central Park East II — and who are comfortable with a traditional elementary-only structure through fifth grade. Its larger enrollment also means more peer diversity and a broader range of extracurricular offerings typical of a 500-plus student school.

CENTRAL PARK EAST II

Central Park East II is the stronger fit for families who want a smaller, more intimate setting — a 7.2:1 student-teacher ratio versus 13.1:1 at PS 163 Alfred E Smith — and who value continuity through middle school, avoiding a separate application process at sixth grade. Its perfect 10.0/10 growth score makes it especially compelling for families whose children need strong academic momentum built year over year.

More Comparisons