Skip to main content

PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH vs PS 92 MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE

PS 92 MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE has a higher overall rating of 9.4/10 compared to 8.8/10. PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH is significantly larger with 524 students, about 3.1× the size of PS 92 MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE (170). In math proficiency, PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH leads at 66.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH PS 92 MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE
Overall Rating 8.8 / 10 9.4 / 10
Academic Score 9.3 8.8
Growth Score 9.7 10.0
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 66.4% 98.2%
Environment Score 5.9 8.6
State Rank #116 of 4,739 #5 of 4,739
State Percentile 98th 100th

Test Scores

Subject PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH PS 92 MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE
Math Proficiency 66.0% 37.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 63.0% 37.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH PS 92 MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Pre-K – 5th Pre-K – 5th
Enrollment 524 170
Student-Teacher Ratio 13.1:1 11.3:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 66.4% 98.2%
Chronic Absenteeism
District NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT # 3 NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT # 5
City New York New York

Neighborhood

Metric New York (10025) New York (10030)
Median Household Income $109,195 $42,738
Median Home Value $1,125,200 $810,100
Median Rent $2,009 $1,204
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 68.8% 34.9%
Poverty Rate 15.1% 32.6%
Avg Commute 32 min 39 min

The data story: PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH vs PS 92 MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE

PS 163 Alfred E Smith holds a 0.7-point overall rating advantage over PS 92 Mary McLeod Bethune, scoring 8.7/10 against 8.0/10. That gap translates to a meaningful state rank difference: PS 163 Alfred E Smith sits at #166 of 4,742 schools in New York, placing it in the top 4% statewide, while PS 92 Mary McLeod Bethune ranks #664 of 4,742 — still a strong top-15% showing, but a notable step down from its crosstown counterpart.

On academics, PS 163 Alfred E Smith scores 9.3/10 versus PS 92 Mary McLeod Bethune's 8.8/10 — a half-point delta that reflects a measurable difference in tested proficiency. Growth tells the opposite story: PS 92 Mary McLeod Bethune edges ahead with a 10.0/10 growth score compared to PS 163 Alfred E Smith's already-strong 9.7/10. That near-perfect growth score signals that PS 92 is accelerating students at an exceptional rate relative to where they start, which matters most for families whose children are entering below grade level or who prioritize year-over-year momentum.

The demographic contrast between the two schools is stark. PS 163 Alfred E Smith enrolls 524 students with 66% qualifying for free or reduced-price lunch and a student-teacher ratio of 13.1:1. PS 92 Mary McLeod Bethune is far smaller at 170 students, carries a 98% free/reduced lunch rate — indicating it serves one of the highest-need populations in the city — and maintains a tighter student-teacher ratio of 11.3:1. Families weighing class size and individual attention will find PS 92's ratio more favorable despite its more limited resources overall.

Both schools serve the same grade span, PK through 5th grade, so neither offers a structural coverage advantage for elementary-age children. At just 1.9 miles apart, geography alone won't decide this choice for most Manhattan families — the deciding factors are the academic achievement ceiling at PS 163 Alfred E Smith versus the exceptional growth trajectory and smaller, more intimate environment at PS 92 Mary McLeod Bethune.

Editorial summary generated May 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH

PS 163 Alfred E Smith suits families whose children are at or above grade level and where maximizing academic achievement benchmarks is the priority. Its top-4% state ranking and 9.3/10 academic score make it the stronger fit for parents who weight tested proficiency and peer cohort performance above class size or growth trajectory.

PS 92 MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE

PS 92 Mary McLeod Bethune is the better fit for families who want a smaller, more personalized environment and prioritize accelerated growth over starting-point proficiency. Its 10.0/10 growth score and 11.3:1 student-teacher ratio make it especially well-suited for children who benefit from close teacher relationships or who are entering school with room to catch up quickly.

More Comparisons