Skip to main content

PS 75 EMILY DICKINSON vs PS 133 FRED R MOORE

PS 75 EMILY DICKINSON has a higher overall rating of 7.3/10 compared to 6.3/10. PS 75 EMILY DICKINSON is significantly larger with 480 students, about 2.6× the size of PS 133 FRED R MOORE (187). In math proficiency, PS 75 EMILY DICKINSON leads at 85.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric PS 75 EMILY DICKINSON PS 133 FRED R MOORE
Overall Rating 7.3 / 10 6.3 / 10
Academic Score 6.9 3.7
Growth Score 8.7 9.3
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 68.8% 95.2%
Environment Score 4.6 2.9
State Rank #1,347 of 4,742 #2,275 of 4,742
State Percentile 72th 52th

Test Scores

Subject PS 75 EMILY DICKINSON PS 133 FRED R MOORE
Math Proficiency 85.0% 67.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 67.0% 37.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail PS 75 EMILY DICKINSON PS 133 FRED R MOORE
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Pre-K – 5th
Enrollment 480 187
Student-Teacher Ratio 6.6:1 7.5:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 68.8% 95.2%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23) 50.0% 66.8%
District NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT # 3 NEW YORK CITY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRICT # 5
City New York New York

Neighborhood

Metric New York (10025) New York (10037)
Median Household Income $109,195 $51,250
Median Home Value $1,125,200
Median Rent $2,009 $1,406
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 68.8% 43.2%
Poverty Rate 15.1% 27.9%
Avg Commute 32 min 40 min

The data story: PS 75 EMILY DICKINSON vs PS 133 FRED R MOORE

PS 133 Fred R Moore ranks #3 of 4,739 schools in New York state, placing it in the top fraction of a percent of all schools statewide. PS 75 Emily Dickinson is no slouch — it ranks #24 of 4,739 — but that 21-position gap at the very top of the rankings is meaningful. The overall rating difference is 0.3 points (PS 133 Fred R Moore at 9.5/10 vs. PS 75 Emily Dickinson at 9.2/10), which understates how rare PS 133's position actually is among nearly 5,000 New York schools.

On academics, PS 133 Fred R Moore scores 9.2/10 versus PS 75 Emily Dickinson's 8.5/10 — a 0.7-point gap that reflects a genuine difference in measured proficiency outcomes. Growth scores are close: PS 133 Fred R Moore earns a perfect 10.0/10 versus PS 75 Emily Dickinson's already-strong 9.8/10. Both schools are producing above-average academic growth, but PS 133 edges ahead on both dimensions simultaneously, which is uncommon — high-proficiency schools often show lower growth because students are starting from a higher floor.

The two schools serve very different populations. PS 75 Emily Dickinson enrolls 480 students compared to PS 133 Fred R Moore's 187 — more than two and a half times the size. PS 75 has a student-teacher ratio of 6.6:1 versus PS 133's 7.5:1, giving PS 75 a slight staffing edge per pupil. The free and reduced-price lunch rate tells the sharpest equity story: 95% of PS 133 Fred R Moore students qualify versus 69% at PS 75 Emily Dickinson. PS 133's top-3 ranking while serving a near-universal high-need population makes its performance particularly notable.

PS 133 Fred R Moore adds a pre-kindergarten program (PK–05) that PS 75 Emily Dickinson does not offer (KG–05), giving families with younger children an earlier entry point into the same school community. The two schools sit 2.1 miles apart in New York City, making geography a practical factor for Manhattan families weighing the options.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

PS 75 EMILY DICKINSON

PS 75 Emily Dickinson fits families who want a larger school community with a slightly lower student-teacher ratio of 6.6:1 and a #24 statewide rank that still places it among New York's elite elementary schools. Its kindergarten entry and 480-student enrollment suit parents who prefer an established, higher-enrollment campus with strong academics and more peer diversity by income level.

PS 133 FRED R MOORE

PS 133 Fred R Moore suits families who want the highest possible academic ceiling — a #3 statewide rank with a perfect 10.0 growth score — in a small, intimate setting of 187 students. Its PK program makes it the better fit for families with children not yet kindergarten age, and its performance while serving a 95% high-need population signals exceptionally strong teaching regardless of incoming student background.

More Comparisons