Skip to main content

Llewellyn Elementary School vs Sitton Elementary School

Llewellyn Elementary School and Sitton Elementary School are very closely rated, both scoring around 9.3 out of 10. In math proficiency, Llewellyn Elementary School leads at 71.0%.

Ratings Comparison

Metric Llewellyn Elementary School Sitton Elementary School
Overall Rating 9.3 / 10 9.2 / 10
Academic Score 9.9 7.8
Growth Score 9.0 9.9
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch 19.1% 70.4%
Environment Score 9.1 9.8
State Rank #22 of 1,226 #30 of 1,226
State Percentile 98th 98th

Test Scores

Subject Llewellyn Elementary School Sitton Elementary School
Math Proficiency 71.0% 12.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency 80.0% 22.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

Detail Llewellyn Elementary School Sitton Elementary School
Type Elementary School Elementary School
Grades Kindergarten – 5th Kindergarten – 5th
Enrollment 393 335
Student-Teacher Ratio 15.7:1 12.0:1
Per-Pupil Spending
Free/Reduced Lunch 19.1% 70.4%
Chronic Absenteeism
District Portland SD 1J Portland SD 1J
City Portland Portland

Neighborhood

Metric Portland (97202) Portland (97203)
Median Household Income $100,353 $77,619
Median Home Value $684,800 $468,600
Median Rent $1,674 $1,551
College Educated (Bachelor's+) 64.7% 45.0%
Poverty Rate 9.9% 19.5%
Avg Commute 24 min 27 min

The data story: Llewellyn Elementary School vs Sitton Elementary School

Llewellyn Elementary School and Sitton Elementary School sit 9.9 miles apart in Portland but land within one point of each other in overall ratings — Llewellyn at 9.3/10 and Sitton at 9.2/10. That near-tie masks meaningful differences underneath. In Oregon's statewide rankings, Llewellyn holds the #22 spot out of 1,226 schools while Sitton sits at #30, both placing each school comfortably in the top 3 percent of the state.

The academic and growth scores pull in opposite directions and tell the clearest story. Llewellyn's academic score of 9.9/10 against Sitton's 7.8/10 is a 2.1-point gap — a concrete signal that students at Llewellyn are hitting proficiency benchmarks at a substantially higher rate. Sitton flips the script on growth: its 9.9/10 growth score versus Llewellyn's 9.0/10 means Sitton students are advancing faster year over year relative to their starting points. Families weighing current proficiency levels against learning velocity will find these two schools pulling in genuinely different directions.

The demographic picture between the schools diverges sharply. Sitton serves a much higher share of economically disadvantaged students — 70% of its enrollment qualifies for free or reduced lunch, compared to 19% at Llewellyn. That difference shapes everything from resource allocation to peer socioeconomic mix. Sitton's student-teacher ratio of 12.0:1 is notably tighter than Llewellyn's 15.7:1, giving Sitton students more individual access to their teachers — a meaningful structural advantage, particularly for students who benefit from closer adult attention. Llewellyn enrolls 393 students versus Sitton's 335, making Sitton the smaller campus by a modest margin.

Both schools serve kindergarten through fifth grade, so families with kids at any elementary age have access to the full K–5 program at either site. The functional difference is context: Llewellyn offers a higher-proficiency academic environment in a lower-poverty setting, while Sitton pairs exceptional growth outcomes with a smaller, more diverse, and more economically mixed student body.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

Llewellyn Elementary School

Llewellyn Elementary School fits families prioritizing current academic proficiency — its 9.9/10 academic score and top-22 state ranking signal that the majority of students are meeting grade-level benchmarks. Parents who want a larger campus with a lower poverty rate (19% FRL) and strong absolute performance will find Llewellyn the clearer choice.

Sitton Elementary School

Sitton Elementary School is the better fit for families who value individualized attention and high growth trajectories. Its 12.0:1 student-teacher ratio gives each child more face time with teachers, and its 9.9/10 growth score — the best possible — means students are accelerating academically regardless of where they start. It also suits families comfortable in a more economically diverse school community.

More Comparisons