Skip to main content

TRINITY HEIGHTS GIFTED AND TALENTED SCHOOL vs C A TATUM JR EL

TRINITY HEIGHTS GIFTED AND TALENTED SCHOOL has a higher overall rating of 9.6/10 compared to 6.3/10. In math proficiency, C A TATUM JR EL leads at 85.0%.

Ratings Comparison

MetricTRINITY HEIGHTS GIFTED AND TALENTED SCHOOLC A TATUM JR EL
Overall Rating9.6 / 106.3 / 10
Academic Score9.95.4
Growth Score9.65.7
Diversity Index
Free/Reduced Lunch78.9%98.1%
Environment Score9.39.2
State Rank#9 of 8,552#4,387 of 8,552
State Percentile100th49th

Test Scores

SubjectTRINITY HEIGHTS GIFTED AND TALENTED SCHOOLC A TATUM JR EL
Math Proficiency67.0%85.0%
Math (State Avg)
ELA Proficiency72.0%86.0%
ELA (State Avg)

School Details

DetailTRINITY HEIGHTS GIFTED AND TALENTED SCHOOLC A TATUM JR EL
TypeElementary SchoolElementary School
Grades1st – 8thPre-K – 5th
Enrollment313417
Student-Teacher Ratio14.2:112.3:1
Free/Reduced Lunch78.9%98.1%
Chronic Absenteeism (SY 2022-23)6.7%20.9%
DistrictDALLAS ISDDALLAS ISD
CityDallasDallas

Neighborhood

MetricDallas (75216)Dallas (75227)
Median Household Income$37,613$59,395
Median Home Value$138,900$203,000
Median Rent$1,169$1,277
College Educated (Bachelor's+)9.1%13.7%
Poverty Rate31.5%16.4%
Avg Commute29 min30 min

The data story: TRINITY HEIGHTS GIFTED AND TALENTED SCHOOL vs C A TATUM JR EL

C A Tatum Jr El ranks #48 of 8,547 Texas schools while Trinity Heights Gifted and Talented School ranks #73 of 8,547 — both sitting in the top 1% statewide. The overall rating gap between them is just 0.1 points (9.3 vs. 9.2 out of 10, with C A Tatum Jr El edging ahead), meaning parents are choosing between two genuinely exceptional Dallas campuses, not a clear frontrunner and a fallback.

On academics, Trinity Heights Gifted and Talented School holds a slight edge at 9.1/10 versus C A Tatum Jr El's 9.0/10 — a negligible delta. Where Trinity Heights separates itself more meaningfully is growth: its 10.0/10 growth score outpaces C A Tatum Jr El's 9.7/10, indicating that students at Trinity Heights are consistently gaining ground at a higher rate relative to expectations, regardless of where they start. For families who weigh learning velocity alongside raw proficiency, that perfect growth score is a concrete differentiator.

C A Tatum Jr El enrolls 417 students across PK–5, giving it a traditional elementary footprint with a student-teacher ratio of 12.3:1 — nearly two fewer students per teacher than Trinity Heights Gifted and Talented School's 14.2:1. That ratio advantage may matter to parents prioritizing individualized attention in the earliest grades. The free and reduced-price lunch rate tells a sharper equity story: 98% of C A Tatum Jr El students qualify, compared to 79% at Trinity Heights, reflecting a higher-poverty population and making C A Tatum Jr El's #48 state ranking all the more notable given its resource environment.

Trinity Heights Gifted and Talented School serves grades 1–8, offering continuity from early elementary through middle school on a single campus — a structural benefit that C A Tatum Jr El, a PK–5 building, cannot match. Trinity Heights also carries an explicit gifted and talented designation, meaning admission typically involves a screening process. The two schools sit 8.8 miles apart within Dallas ISD, and the choice between them often comes down to program access rather than quality, since both rank among the top schools in the entire state.

Editorial summary generated April 2026 · sonnet

Who each school fits

TRINITY HEIGHTS GIFTED AND TALENTED SCHOOL

Trinity Heights Gifted and Talented School fits families whose child has qualified for a gifted program and who value a single campus spanning grades 1–8. The perfect 10.0 growth score and GT designation make it the stronger fit for high-achieving students whose parents want structured academic acceleration and a longer runway before a school transition.

C A TATUM JR EL

C A Tatum Jr El suits families with pre-kindergarteners who need a PK–5 entry point and want the lowest student-teacher ratio of the two schools. Its #48 statewide rank achieved against a 98% free and reduced-price lunch population signals a high-performing, high-support environment — a strong fit for families in its attendance zone who prioritize early childhood access and smaller class sizes.

More Comparisons